Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
6000-ss (feeder)x
56.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €59.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000-SS (Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in weight (155g / 5,47oz) and ergonomics (6.48 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT and Shimano Complex XR?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
- A line retrieve score of 8.7 out of 10 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
