Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05 lbs) and total score (6.31 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05 lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
