Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT, 3000-C (Match), left and right hand, Match fishing reel, Front Drag, 10217-300
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €49.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C (Match)
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 3000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-305
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €61.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX stands out for for the same. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables