Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT

Feeder And Match

3000-c (match)x

63.10 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.98 out of 10

Ergonomics6.06 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €49.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-C (Match)
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)

Multireels

86.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio3.58:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight800g / 28219oz

Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €599.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X

Rated 8.51 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios