Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.55 out of 10) and the total score (7.69 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons
Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin REDIX
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX