Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
