Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.49 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
