Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
