Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
