Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a durability of 5.89 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
