Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT

Spinning

65.40 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.15 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight255g / 8.99oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €75.30
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

88.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.47 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight160g / 5.64oz

Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €668.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.87 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.