Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
