Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
