Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 255g / 8,99oz and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
