Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT

Spinning

65.40 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.15 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight255g / 8.99oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €75.30
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

76.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.56 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.4:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €389.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000XGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.56 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a ball bearings of 5, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency