Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a durability of 8.6 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
