Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the total score (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.53 out of 10 and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
