Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
