Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
