Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
