Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin REDIX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
