Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €490.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin RAYA body
