Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX
