Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (4.8:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX