Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (265g / 9,35oz) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
