Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (4.8:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
