Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
