Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Complex XR C2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Complex XR C2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Complex XR?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
