Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €421.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 MXGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/110
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Exsence?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
