Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Exsence?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
