Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.16
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
