Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 M HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 125/0.13
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
