Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a ergonomics of 6.37 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X
