Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
