Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.8:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
