Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
