Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.8:1) and the total score (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X
Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX