Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
