Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (8). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
