Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a durability of 8.6 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
