Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
