Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
92.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €469.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
