Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
