Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (305g / 10,76oz). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin REDIX
Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Delphin REDIX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX