Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a durability of 8.61 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
