Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (305g / 10,76oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
