Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Exsence?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
