Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 160/0.16
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
