Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 M HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 125/0.13
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
