Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
